Inflammation

Inflammation. It is the hallmark of many diseases (perhaps *all* diseases), including lupus.

We have an epidemic of inflammation in this country, and it's killing us. There is a direct link between inflammation and obesity, inflammation and cancer, inflammation and diabetes, inflammation and lupus, and certainly inflammation and pain.

From what I can tell, anything with the suffix "itis" is inflammation.
bronchitis= inflammation of the bronchial tubes
nephritis= inflammation of the kidneys
pancreatitis= inflammation of the pancreas.
Etc., etc. etc.

So what causes inflammation and how can we get rid of it?

Inflammation is like a fire. There is always heat associated with inflammation. It can range from simmering smoldering embers to a full-on 4-alarm blaze. When I've experienced joint swelling and pain from lupus, those joints are always hot, like they are literally burning. The fire, or irritation, is "the bringing of a bodily part or organ to an abnormally excited or sensitive condition." And what would cause this- what would ignite such an internal fire in a human body? The human body is inflamed by stress, toxins, allergens, and food additives.

To reduce inflammation, we can use 2 approaches: 

1. stop feeding the fire. Remove the offending irritants by reducing stress, identifying and removing allergens and toxins, and avoiding processed foods.
2. douse the fire with anti-inflammatory substances. This includes either:

• drugs (anti-inflammatory drugs, which include NSAIDs - nonsteroidal inflammatory drugs such as Advil, Aleve, aspirin, etc. as well as more heavy duty anti-inflammatories, such as corticosteroids and chemotherapy).
• more natural means. and we have 2 choices here:

1. eat an anti-inflammatory diet. This would involve no sugar, no dairy, little meat, few grains, lots of vegetables.
2. take supplements. Specifically fish oil. More specifically, high-grade pharmaceutical, clean fish oil, such as Barlean's, every single day.

Approach #1 (stop feeding the fire) is a great first step for anyone and everyone, and for some people might be enough- especially if they learn of food allergies and sensitivities and take those foods out of their diet. For example, if you learn you have Celiac disease and remove all gluten (and for some people, dairy as well), you will have no more Celiac problems. Do what you can to remove toxins from your environment and allergens and "fake foods" from your diet. For me, removing aspartame and MSG meant no more migraines, and removing gluten meant no more joint pain, and much better digestion.

Other folks, especially those with chronic inflammation, will need to do more. So which of these options is best?

The problem with taking anti-inflammatory drugs long-term is that these drugs, though effective at relieving pain, are hazardous to your health. An anti-inflammatory diet is a wonderful choice, though it can be hard to implement at times (especially when eating out). In general, I believe everyone should try to move their diet towards being less inflammatory. Less sugar, less meat, no artificial sweeteners, lots more veggies.

One thing I believe we can all do every day is to take high-grade fish oil daily. Douse the inflammation. Put out the fire! My current favorite brand is Barlean's. It was recommended to me by an MD. He believes anyone with lupus should take fish oil daily. So do I.

If you or someone you know would like to talk to me about reaching your health goals, send me an email. I am a holistic health coach. E mail me for a free one-hour health consultation, whether it's about implementing an anti-inflammatory diet, losing a few pounds, or finding life balance- anyone who wants to achieve their health goals, big or small- e mail me at carla@thesingingpatient.com .

'til next time, be well, my little fishies!

Carla

Carla Ubrich, The Singing Patient and Health Coach

www.thesingingpatient.com

www.bestpossibleme.com - health coaching- visit this site to get a free e book on nutrition!

www.youtube.com/user/carlaulbrich- funny medical songs

http://tinyurl.com/348hroc - Carla's book

a breath of not so fresh air

Hello faithful readers!

Today's topic: fresh air.
I just returned from a music conference where a friend of mine (Angela) is fighting an uphill battle to make people aware of MCS (Multiple chemical sensitivity). She has been crippled by it. She lost her job because of mold exposure (at the job!) and, if I remember correctly, she traces her MCS onset to the mold exposure.

I understand it to a small degree, because I have sensitivities to smoke and perfumes, and can end up either sneezing or getting a headache from a short exposure. Her consequences are far more serious. And the reason for her attempts at increasing awareness is not to garner sympathy, but to get people to reduce the amount of chemicals they spray on themselves before going into a confined crowded space to interact with others.

"The right to swing my fist ends where the other man's nose begins." - attributed to Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.   Perhaps, too, your right to perfume the air with toxic chemicals ends where my nose begins.

Every year Angela brings organic healthy liquid soap and lotion and stocks the lobby bathrooms of the hotel with them, to reduce the chemical fragrance load at the conference. Still, in order to participate, she has to wear a gas mask most of the time at the conference (partly because the hotel is a little moldy). Still, small changes like changing the soap and lotion mean that (unlike previous years) she can now occasionally remove the mask and have a conversation.






Much better than the typical nasty pink soap, which i must say, suspiciously resembles (in both color and fragrance) the pink urinal cakes. Not that I use the men's room (except in desperate gas station situations)- but I once had a job cleaning toilets. Yes, the glamorous life of show biz, I know. Well, hey, I could only go up from there.

Where were we? Oh, yes, fragrance. I'm baffled that so many people "freshen" the air in their homes with chemicals- plugins, stickups, sprays, perfumes- I can just feel my lungs closing up. When we were discussing the public overload of cologne and perfume before the conference (often just walking down the street I have to cover my face to avoid inhaling a gallon of cologne-saturated air)- knowing the amount of neurotransmitter interruption caused by these chemicals, it starts to make me miss good old fashioned B.O.  Maybe that's what my dog likes about sniffing another dog's butt- at least it's organic.

OK, maybe we don't want stinky homes- or armpits- but there are plenty of natural non-toxic effective ways to de-stink.

For the pits: Burt's bees or tom's deodorant. As a major bonus, they also do not contain aluminum, which is linked to Alzheimer's. And anti-perspirant may be linked to breast cancer. (Think about it: our bodies want to sweat and we won't allow it? This can't end well.) Here's my favorite:




For the home: house plants clean the air. I've had peace lilies in the living room for years, and I also just got a snake plant, which is commonly used in the bedroom because it gives off lots of oxygen at night.




For the home: Moso bags are charcoal, which absorb toxins. You set them in the sun outdoors for an hour once a month so they can offgas (release) all the toxins. They last for 2 years. 500g size is for one normal sized room.




And for the car (Dear God, if I have to ride in another taxi that smells like a pink-pine-tree-cigarette...): Mosu bags also come in small sizes for the car!



Happy breathing~

Carla Ubrich, The Singing Patient and Health Coach

www.thesingingpatient.com

www.bestpossibleme.com - health coaching

www.youtube.com/user/carlaulbrich- funny medical songs

http://tinyurl.com/348hroc - Carla's book

Lupus and Diet

Today I spoke/ sang for a support group at the SLE Foundation in NY City. What a great group of people.
Lots of great energy and ideas bouncing around, and I was heartened and inspired by the open-mindedness, strength, willingness and ease of communication. Right near Penn Station, too- really easy to get to!

I've mentioned this before, but I'll mention it again. Support groups for lupus have come a long, long way in 20 years. When I first became ill with lupus, support groups had 2 allowed topics: prednisone and lawyers. Any talk of alternative medicine or emotional stuff was shut down. So happy to say that is no longer the case. I watched today as a patient brought up her concerns about cellcept and placquenil to the rest of us, and we were all able to inform her of our experiences, helping to ease some of her anxiety and sort things out so she could make a decision. Beautiful.

From their wall (if this were a bumper sticker, it would be like "baby on board!"):

Typically when I talk, I tell my story and how humor, creativity, alternative medicine and diet helped me get my health back. When speaking to this group today, the focus was really about how I got to be in a drug-free remission, with all my hair and enough energy to do what I want to do in life. And we talked a LOT about diet. People interjected with comments and questions, which was great- I love an interactive dialogue, versus a monologue (90% of my gigs are a "performance" and all the audience does is clap and occasionally sing along when invited to do so). I learn things too. (For example, I did not know that 1/3 of lupus patients have RA and 1/3 of RA patients have lupus. Explains why the "purple jewelry" charm bracelet I have has both an RA blue ribbon and a purple lupus ribbon).

I was surprised how very interested- not just receptive, but really interested- these patients were in hearing about diet. And that is what we talked about most.

There are 2 diets I've seen out there which both claim to heal/ help/ even cure lupus patients:
Paleo Diet ("caveman" diet that is meat and veggies- and lots of raw food)
Lowfat Raw Vegan (no meat! but all raw food, both fruits and veggies).

Seems confusing- all meat, no meat- what's better?
Perhaps a better question is: what do these 2 effective anti-lupus diets have in common? And from what I can tell, it's a lack of dairy and a lack of grains, particularly gluten. This diet is known as the GFCF diet (gluten free, casein free- a.k.a. dairy free) and has been used effectively with numerous autoimmune diseases and autism.

My hope and dream in going to speak to lupus (and MS and myositis and RA) patients is to one day hear back from some of them that they tried a GFCF  diet, and it helped to reduce or eliminate symptoms, and helped them to reduce or eliminate their need for immune suppressants. And for those who have trouble learnign this diet on their own, I offer reduced rates for patients as a health coach, where I also support and educate people so they can relearn to eat in this somewhat counter-cultural way. It isn't easy at first, but it gets easier after you adjust. And even when it's at its hardest, it's easier than being on prednisone. I have my life back. My desire is to give this gift to others suffering from lupus.

If you or someone you know would like to have a free one-hour health consultation with me, whether it's about gluten-free or not- anyone who wants to achieve their health goals, big or small- please e mail me at healthcoach@bestpossibleme.com .

On another post I'll talk again (I have before) about the other 2 bugaboos I eliminated:
MSG and nutrasweet. Happy trails 'til next posting~

Carla Ubrich, The Singing Patient

www.thesingingpatient.com

www.bestpossibleme.com - health coaching

www.youtube.com/user/carlaulbrich- funny medical songs

get the book! http://tinyurl.com/348hroc

Most Women with Lupus Can Have Successful Pregnancy Outcomes

Most Women with Lupus Can Have Successful Pregnancy Outcomes

Results from Multicenter NIH PROMISSE Study Find Pregnancy Safe for 80 Percent of Women with Lupus

Chicago, November 5, 2011—Promising research led by investigators at Hospital for Special Surgery may offer hope for women with lupus who once thought that pregnancy was too risky.

Results from the multicenter National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded PROMISSE initiative, being presented Monday, Nov. 7 and then during a press conference on Tuesday, Nov. 8, during the American College of Rheumatology’s 2011 Annual Scientific Meeting in Chicago, show that most women with stable lupus can have successful pregnancies.


“There was a misconception, based on outdated experience, that women with lupus should not try to have children,” said Jane Salmon, M.D., the study’s senior author and Collette Kean Research Chair at Hospital for Special Surgery in New York City. “Now that our treatments are more effective and we have a better understanding of the disease, we can identify a window when pregnancy is safe and outcomes are good for mother and fetus.”

Historically, women with systemic lupus erythematosus (also know as SLE or lupus) have been advised not to become pregnant because of risks to their own and their fetus’ health. SLE is a chronic inflammatory disease, in which the body’s own immune system attacks tissues of the body and can cause complications during pregnancy.


Drs. Salmon, together with Jill Buyon from New York University Medical Center, and their collaborators evaluated 333 pregnant women with lupus from the PROMISSE Study (Predictors of pRegnancy Outcome: BioMarkers In antiphospholipid antibody Syndrome and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus), which seeks to identify biomarkers that predict poor pregnancy outcomes. The research team found that 80 percent of lupus patients had a favorable pregnancy outcome.

Patients with lupus may be free of symptoms for long periods of time and then experience a disease “flare,” when symptoms such as rash, joint pain, chest pain, swollen legs, bruising and/or fatigue suddenly appear.

“Most women with stable lupus, defined as limited disease activity and no flares during the time of conception and the first trimester, had successful pregnancies,” explained Dr. Salmon, who is also the principal investigator of the PROMISSE Study. “We learn from these results that timing is a most important element for successful pregnancy in women with lupus and that avoiding pregnancy during periods of increased disease activity is essential.”

In the study, two categories of pregnancy complications were evaluated: the health of the mother and of the fetus. The research team studied development of mild, moderate, or severe increases of lupus activity, or flares, in expectant mothers. For the fetus, the study examined the worst outcome – death – or situations in which the well-being of the child would require extended hospitalization in a critical care unit.

Of the 333 women with lupus studied, 63 had poor outcomes. Ten percent of mothers experienced preeclampsia, a serious complication characterized by the onset of high blood pressure and appearance of protein in the urine. Ten percent experienced mild or moderate flares at 20 weeks and eight percent experienced flares at 32 weeks. Nineteen women experienced death of the fetus and 30 women delivered before 36 weeks or had newborns of small gestational size – smaller in size than normal for the baby's sex and gestational age, commonly defined as a weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age.

None of the women in the study was pregnant with more than one fetus, took more than 20 mg/day of prednisone, or had abnormally high excretion of protein or impaired kidney function. The women who experienced complications had more active lupus at 20 and 32 weeks and higher levels of antiphospholipid antibodies.

[My question here is- did the pregnancy trigger the flare for these women? If the active lupus doesn't kick in until week 20, the women is already pregnant at the time the flare starts, so her lupus being "stable" is not a guarantee that her pregnancy will end well. How can we know whether a woman is in that 80% or the 20%? Since I have met women with lupus whose pregnancies ended in miscarriages and one whose pregnancy triggered a flare that is still active, 10 years after the fact, I would still temper the hope for a good outcome - very good news for women with lupus who deeply desire to bear their own child- with the caution of a possible very bad outcome. Know the risks going in- for 20% of these patients, the pregnancy had a bad outcome. How is that statistic in comparison with healthy women? How many healthy women have pregnancies resulting in their own poor health and/ or miscarriages? Probably not 20%. Of course, 80% of pregnant lupus patients having a desirable outcome is far better than we believed it would be.]

The PROMISSE study was funded by the National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health in 2003 to identify biomarkers that would predict poor pregnancy outcomes in lupus patients. To date, the PROMISSE investigative team has enrolled 647 volunteers who are monitored with monthly checkups and research laboratory studies looking at genes and circulating proteins that may predict the course of pregnancy. PROMISSE will continue through 2013 with $12.3 million in support over ten years from NIAMS and the office of Research in Women’s Health. Dr. Salmon and co-investigators from 11 academic centers will continue to examine a broad range of genes and molecular pathways that can affect pregnancy in women with lupus, and, it is anticipated that their findings will have applications for the prevention of miscarriage and preeclampsia in healthy women.

The PROMISSE Study is coordinated by Dr. Salmon; Other investigators include Michael Lockshin, M.D., and Lisa Sammaritano, M.D., at Hospital for Special Surgery; Jill Buyon, M.D., at New York University School of Medicine; Ware Branch, M.D., at University of Utah Health Sciences Center; Carl Laskin, M.D., at Mt. Sinai Hospital in Toronto, Canada; Joan Merrill, M.D., at the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation; Michelle Petri, M.D., MPH, at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Mimi Kim, D.Sc., at Albert Einstein College of Medicine; and Mary Stephenson, M.D., at the University of Chicago.

About Hospital for Special Surgery
Founded in 1863, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) is a world leader in orthopedics, rheumatology and rehabilitation. HSS is nationally ranked No. 1 in orthopedics, No. 2 in rheumatology, No. 19 in neurology, and No. 16 in geriatrics by U.S.News & World Report (2011-12), and has received Magnet Recognition for Excellence in Nursing Service from the American Nurses Credentialing Center, and has one of the lowest infection rates in the country. From 2007 to 2011, HSS has been a recipient of the HealthGrades Joint Replacement Excellence Award. A member of the NewYork-Presbyterian Healthcare System and an affiliate of Weill Cornell Medical College, HSS provides orthopedic and rheumatologic patient care at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital at New York Weill Cornell Medical Center. All Hospital for Special Surgery medical staff are on the faculty of Weill Cornell Medical College. The hospital's research division is internationally recognized as a leader in the investigation of musculoskeletal and autoimmune diseases. Hospital for Special Surgery is located in New York City and online at www.hss.edu.

Lupus Research Findings

Below are highlights of patient-focused research from Hospital for Special Surgery that will be presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) in Chicago, from November 5-9. This information was forwarded to me by the Hospital for Special Surgery. I have pasted it verbatim, minus the room locations for the conference. My comments on the research findings are inserted below each study.

Hospital for Special Surgery Physician-Scientists Share Advances in Rheumatology Research

Chicago, November 5, 2011—Hospital for Special Surgery physician-scientists who focus on arthritis, lupus, vasculitis and related conditions are traveling from New York City to Chicago this week to share their recent findings at the 75th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR).

Highlights of presentations by Hospital for Special Surgery physician-scientists include:

Most Women with Lupus Can Have Successful Pregnancy Outcomes

Investigators of the NIH-funded PROMISSE Study (Predictors of pRegnancy Outcome: BioMarkers In antiphospholipid antibody Syndrome and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus) evaluated 333 pregnant women with lupus and found that 80 percent of patients had a favorable pregnancy outcome. The findings provide reassurance for patients with stable lupus, who are contemplating pregnancy, and suggest factors that merit caution for the minority of high-risk lupus patients. “Patients enrolled in this study had inactive lupus at the time of conception and during their first trimester, which we believe explains why a large majority of these women had successful and uncomplicated pregnancies,” explained Jane Salmon, M.D. “Now that our treatments are more effective and we have a better understanding of the disease, we can identify a window when pregnancy is safe and outcomes are good for mother and fetus. Our findings should change the way patients and physicians view pregnancy in women with lupus.”

[Would like to know more about the 20% who didn't do so well. It's nice to encourage people but also wise to caution them. What women should *not* to try get pregnant? I met a lupus patient who had survived 9 miscarriages. My next blog post will give further detail on their findings.]

Life Challenges Prevent Those with Lupus from Keeping Doctors’ Appointments 

Healthcare providers at the Mary Kirkland Center for Lupus Care observed that many patients failed to keep doctors’ appointments, which can lead to less-favorable outcomes in these lupus patients’ care. Researchers at the Center examined this patient population, largely homogenous with low socioeconomic status, and found that most of these individuals did not attend their appointments because of either tardy or unreliable transportation, such as ambulettes, or because of insufficient childcare. “Healthcare appointment compliance is critical for a lupus patient’s care, because timely communication with their physician keeps both parties up-to-date on prescription and care instructions,” explained senior author. Doruk Erkan, M.D. “By not following up with scheduled appointments, patients may stay on a course of medication that should be changed, which could quickly become dangerous.”  

[ OK, clearly the current system of patients schlepping all over the place and killing a half day to get 8 minutes with a doctor isn't working, especially for people of lesser means. Heck, even those of us of medium means, once we get there, have a hard time sitting around in crowded, germy, cold, fluorescent-lit waiting rooms. We obviously can't go back to the old days of house calls- doctors are too used to having everyone come to them- but perhaps we can move forward and embrace technology, allowing patients to phone, e mail, text, or skype in their appointments. It's not as good as in person, but it's better than people not having an appointment at all. And let me just point out, at least for me, the appointment is *two* appointments because I have to go to the lab a week before the appointment to get my blood drawn. That one can't be skyped or phoned in- I have to go- but maybe a traveling lab service? Maybe at a local Walgreens? I was at one point going to a clinic who wanted me to come every single week- one for labs, once for some other test, once for my appointment- and I wasn't allowed to drive because I wasa anemic. I had to get someone to drive me every time, and it was an hour from my house. I said "Can't I just get my blood drawn near my house?" They said, and I quote "Well this is more convenient for us." Seriously??? We have to make things more patient-friendly. Period. That is what I get from this research. ]



Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Have Low Expectations After Knee Replacement Surgery 

Compared with osteoarthritis (OA) patients, individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who undergo total knee replacement surgery have lower expectations about their postsurgical outcomes. These lower expectations could cause some patients to slack on their postsurgical rehabilitation, leading to worse outcomes. The researchers compared 62 RA patients with 124 OA patients to make their conclusions. “If rheumatoid arthritis patients are healthy enough to have surgery, they should really expect good outcomes. It would be a real shame if these patients could have significantly improved function, but don’t because they expect to be able to do less in their postsurgery therapy,” said Lisa Mandl, M.D., co-author of the study and rheumatologist at Hospital for Special Surgery. “What we can do as doctors is ensure that we educate our patients properly,” said Susan Goodman, M.D., HSS rheumatologist who led the study.


[I don't have RA but I do agree with the belief and the finding here that is you expect a bad outcome, you will help create a bad outcome by both your belief and your actions which line up with that expectation- a.k.a "self-fulfilling prophecy."]

One-Year Results of Cardiovascular Intervention Program in Lupus and Antiphospholipid Antibody 

Results from the first year of a three-year cardiovascular disease prevention counseling program in lupus patients show that the program’s patients are motivated to better control their cardiovascular health by maintaining healthy diet and exercise regimes. However, while there was a significant improvement in diet and exercise habits, the findings do not show a significant improvement in clinical parameters such as high blood pressure, body-mass index, or cholesterol profile at one-year follow-up. “We’re encouraged that these patients are working hard to improve their cardiovascular health, and it is possible that they will have improved results after the study has reached the end of its third year,” said senior author Doruk Erkan, M.D. “These results demonstrate just how difficult it is for lupus patients to improve their cardiovascular disease risk factors that would be relatively easier to achieve in most other individuals.”


[OK, and now how about some info as to *why* this is the case? I guess in order to find this out I'd need to be at the conference this weekend. But, since I just learned about this conference, and my time machine and transporter devices are on the fritz, I'll just have to wonder. This is a very discouraging bit of news, that motivated lupus patients can change their lifestyles and yet not lose weight or improve their overall health. Why is this? Are they on drugs that cause weight gain? What diet cahnges and what exercises were they doing? More info, please. Don't leave us powerless and hopeless.]

Tweaking Withdrawal of Rheumatoid Arthritis Medications Before Surgery May Reduce Disease Flares 
To minimize infections, doctors stop giving anti-TNF medications before surgery.  These medications are powerful immunosuppressants and effectively control disease activity in RA patients.  However, it is not known how long anti-TNFs should be held prior to surgery to ensure the best outcomes in patients.  Stopping them too early may put these patients at risk for RA flares, which may complicate recovery. This study found no increased risk of infections in RA patients taking anti-TNF medications compared with those not on these medications, and a trend toward more postoperative flares in the anti-TNF patients. Different anti-TNFs were held seemingly arbitrarily, with no correlation to half-life.  Rheumatologist Lisa Mandl, M.D., senior author of the study, said more evidence-based studies are needed to determine optimal timing of pre-operative use of these medications.

[Interesting. Worth studying. I don't have RA, so not much else to say.]

Stress Triggers Disease Flares in Patients with Vasculitis 

Stress can contribute to disease flares in those with Wegener’s granulomatosis – a form of vasculitis that causes inflammation that destroys blood vessels. This is the first study to show that mental health is a risk factor for patients with vasculitis. “When this disease flares, people are really sick. It affects the lungs, sinuses, kidneys and nerves, and can cause fever and rashes,” said Robert Spiera, M.D., lead author of the study and director of the Vasculitis and Scleroderma Program at Hospital for Special Surgery. Dr. Spiera suggests that doctors be attentive to the psychological health of these patients along with their medical care.

[ Well, I'm glad we have a specific study to back up what we already know- stress triggers flares in ALL diseases. Science often seems to have the job of proving that common sense is... wow, true. But nowadays you can't go around spouting common sense without a scientific study to back you up, or you'll get sued. So, thanks science! Stress is BAD!]

About Hospital for Special Surgery :



Founded in 1863, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) is a world leader in orthopedics, rheumatology and rehabilitation. HSS is nationally ranked No. 1 in orthopedics, No. 2 in rheumatology, No. 19 in neurology, and No. 16 in geriatrics by U.S.News & World Report (2011-12), and has received Magnet Recognition for Excellence in Nursing Service from the American Nurses Credentialing Center, and has one of the lowest infection rates in the country. From 2007 to 2011, HSS has been a recipient of the HealthGrades Joint Replacement Excellence Award. A member of the NewYork-Presbyterian Healthcare System and an affiliate of Weill Cornell Medical College, HSS provides orthopedic and rheumatologic patient care at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital at New York Weill Cornell Medical Center. All Hospital for Special Surgery medical staff are on the faculty of Weill Cornell Medical College. The hospital's research division is internationally recognized as a leader in the investigation of musculoskeletal and autoimmune diseases. Hospital for Special Surgery is located in New York City and online at www.hss.edu

About Carla Ulbrich:
Carla Ulbrich is The Singing Patient and author of How Can You Not Laugh at a Time Like This?, a book which has received the Lupus Foundation of America's Seal of Approval. She lives in Central New Jersey, has released 5 CDs of funny songs, and has strong opinions on the topic of lupus, as she has been living with it for 20 years. An avid user of alternative medicine and a reluctant user of mainstream medicine, there is hardly anything Carla hasn't tried to regain her health. And a lot of it worked. Carla is very active, and has fully recovered from stroke and kidney failure to resume touring and performing as a comical songwriter. Many of her songs are about her "adventures" as a patient ("Sittin' in the Waiting Room," "On the Commode Again," "Prednisone," etc.) Hear them here:
 www.thesingingpatient.com